References

 

**Leadership Project Literature Review **  the purpose of a writing center the positive effects of peer tutoring exemplary feedback for writers the implementation of a writing center at the high school level **References** You may click on the references below to view their annotations.
 * Key Issues: **

Barnett, R. (2006). Collaboratively establishing high school writing centers in Flint, Michigan, to support the improvement of students' writing skills. The Clearing House, 80, 2.80-83. Retrieved February 27, 2009, from ProQuest Database.

Gillespie, P. & Lerner, N. (2004). The Allyn and Bacon Guide to Peer Tutoring. (2nd ed). New York: Pearson Longman.

Herrman, A.W. (1989). Teaching writing with peer response groups encouraging revision. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English, and Communication Digest. 38. Retrieved February 26, 2009, fromhttp://www.indiana.edu/~reading/ieo/digests/d38.html

Kent, Richard. (2006). A Guide to Creating Student-Staffed Writing Centers: Grades 6-12. New York: Peter Lang.

Lambert, G. M.S. (1999). Helping 12th grade honors English students improve writing skills through conferencing. Unpublished master’s thesis. Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved February 27, 2009, from ERIC Database.

Lin, Sunny S.J, Liu, Eric Z.F., & Yuan, S.M. (2002). Student attitudes toward networked peer assessment: case studies of undergraduate students and senior high school students. International Journal of Instructional Media 29, 2. Retrieved February 26, 2009, from ProQuest Database.

Longwill, A.W. & Kleinert, H.L. (1998). The unexpected benefits of high school peer tutoring. Teaching Exceptional Children. 30, 4. 60-65.

North, S.M. (1984). The idea of a writing center. 2003.In C. Murphy & S. Sherwood (Eds.). The St. Martin's Sourcebook for Writing Tutors (2nd ed.) Boston: Bedford St. Martins.

Sommers, N. (1982, May). “Responding to student writing.” College Composition and Communication.33,2. 148-156.Retrieved February 27, 2009, from ERIC database.

Straub, Richard. (1996). “The concept of control in teacher response: defining the varieties of ‘directive’ and ‘facilitative’ commentary.” College Composition and Communication.47, 2. 223-251. Retrieved February 27, 2009, from ERIC database.